Home Page Company Clients Partners Reports CallWeb SampleCalc EPlanCalc French
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
An article recently published by Sarah Appleton-Dyer, Janet Clinton, Peter Carswell and Rob McNeill in the American Journal of Evaluation (vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 532-546) piqued our interest. In a time when evaluation budgets for government programs are shrinking, the question of evaluation use becomes increasingly salient. The authors, in Understanding Evaluation Influence Within Public Sector Partnerships: A Conceptual Model, ground their endeavour to explore this theme in the literature.
As Appleton-Dyer, Clinton, Carswell and McNeill point out, "evaluation use (...) is a complex phenomenon that is still not well understood." (p. 532) They choose to leave behind the four typically-inventoried types of evaluation use that they briefly describe (instrumental, conceptual, symbolic and process use ) and focus on evaluation use as influence, because "this term encompasses traditional conceptions of use, as well as various changes at the individual, interpersonal and collective levels." (p. 533) The authors also see value in highlighting "the numerous factors that can affect the influence of an evaluation, including context." (p. 533) The article draws on the literature of other disciplines to map out elements that may contribute to evaluation use. These elements are broken down into various categories, which, based on the literature, may interact with one another:
 The term was originally coined in the field of urban planning in 1973 by Rittel and Webber. See the followign brief overviews: New Tools For Resolving Wicked Problems and An Introduction to Wicked Problems
To reach us:
General address : email@example.com
Benoît Gauthier : firstname.lastname@example.org, @BGauthierCEEQ
Tel. : +1 819 775-2620, Fax : (no more fax; sorry)
238 Fleming Road, Cantley, Québec J8V 3B4